Ten percent of companies committing fraud new study concludes

New research has said that those companies which are found to be guilty of corporate fraud are the tip of a huge iceberg and it on only those firms which are faced with greater scrutiny due to others circumstance which tend to be found out.

It comes after professor Alexander Dyck, from the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, and other researchers undertook a study to see how much fraud was detected during a period of heightened scrutiny.

Dyck and his team found that under typical surveillance, about three percent of US companies are found doing something funny with their books in any given year. They determined that number by looking at financial misrepresentations exposed by auditors, enforcement releases by the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), financial restatements, and full legal prosecutions by the SEC against insider trading, all between 1997 and 2005.

However, the freefall and unexpected collapse of auditing firm Arthur Andersen, starting in 2001, due to its involvement in the Enron accounting scandal, gave Prof. Dyck, from the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management, and other researchers the chance to examine how much fraud was detected when there were increased scrutiny on firms.

It represented “a huge opportunity,” that rarely comes along, said Dyck, putting 20 percent of all US publicly traded companies – the slice that had been working with Andersen and were forced to find new auditors – under a higher-powered microscope due to their previous association with the disgraced accounting firm.

Those companies did not show a greater propensity to fraud compared to other companies in the 1998 to 2000 period. But that changed once the spotlight was turned on beginning 30 November, 2001 – the date when Andersen client Enron began filing for bankruptcy – until the end of 2003, the period the researchers looked at. The new auditors, as well as regulators, investors and news media were all looking much more closely at the ex-Andersen companies.

“What we found was that there was three times as much detected fraud in the companies that were subjected to this special treatment, as a former Andersen firm, compared to those that weren’t,” said Dyck, who holds the Manulife Financial chair in Financial Services and is the director of the Capital Markets Institute at the Rotman School.

The researchers used the finding to infer that the real number of companies involved in fraud is at least 10 percent. That correlates with previous research that has estimated the true incidence of corporate fraud between 10 and 18 percent. While the researchers were looking at US companies, Dyck speculated that the ratio of undetected-to-detected fraud is not significantly different in Canada.

Given those numbers, the researchers estimated that fraud destroys about 1.6 percent of a company’s equity value, mostly due to diminished reputation among those in the know, representing about $830 billion in current U.S. dollars.

The results should capture the attention of anyone with responsibility for corporate oversight and research, Dyck added: “I spend a lot of time running a program for directors of public corporations and I tout this evidence when I say, ‘Do I think you guys should be spending time worrying about these things? Yes. The problem is bigger than you might think.’”